What authority is invested in the High Court ?

Under section 38 of the Copyright Act:
The Court shall have the authority -
a) to grant injunctions to prohibit the committing, or continuation of committing, of an infringement of any right protected under this Act;
b) to order the impounding of copies of works or sound recordings suspected of being made or imported without the authorization of the owner of any right protected under this Act where the making or importation of copies is subject to such authorization, as well as the impounding of the packaging of, the implements that could be used for the making of, and the documents, accounts or business papers referring to, such copies;
c) to order the forfeiture and seizure of all copies of works or sound recordings manufactured, reproduced, distributed, sold or otherwise used, intended for use or possessed with intent to use in contravention of section 8 or 22 and all plates, moulds, matrices, masters, tapes, film negatives, or other articles by means of which such copies of works or sound recordings may be reproduced, and all electronic, mechanical or other devices for manufacturing, reproducing, or assembling such copies of works or sound recordings;
d) to order that the owner of any right protected under this Act whose right has been infringed, be paid by the infringer, damages adequate to compensate for the injury suffered as a consequence of the act of infringement, as well as the payment of expenses caused by the infringement, including legal costs;
(e) to fix the amount of damages taking into account the pecuniary and non-pecuniary loss suffered by the owner of the right;
(f) to order an account of the infringer's profits attributable to the infringement;
(g) where infringing copies exist, to order the destruction or other reasonable disposition of those copies and their packaging outside the channels of commerce in such a manner as to avoid harm to the right holder, unless the owner of the right requests otherwise.
(2) Where the infringer did not know or had no reasonable reason to know that he was engaged in infringing activity, the Court may limit damages to the profits of the infringer attributable to the infringement.
(3) Where there is a danger that implements may be used to commit or continue to commit acts of infringement, the Court shall have the authority, whenever and to the extent that it is reasonable, to order their destruction or other reasonable disposition outside the channels of commerce in such a manner as to minimize the risks of further infringements, including surrender to the owner of the right.
(4) The Court shall not, in respect of the same infringement, both award the owner of rights damages and order that he shall be given an account of profits.
(5) The provisions of subsection (1)(g) shall not be applicable to copies and their packaging which were acquired by a third party in good faith.
(6) Where there is a danger that acts of infringement may be continued, the Court shall have the authority to order that such acts not be committed and the Court shall fix a fine of five thousand dollars for each day on which the infringement is continued, which fine shall be paid if the order is not respected.
More information Please

Contact us: trinidadlegal@googlemail.com
Phone/Fax: (868) 673-5282 ; Mobile Phone: (868) 776-3416